Vietnamese leaders maintain a packed schedule of state ceremonies ahead of Tet

HANOI – Vietnam’s top leadership fanned out across the country this week for a series of high-profile engagements ahead of the Lunar New Year, known locally as Tet.

General Secretary To Lam traveled to Quang Ninh province to meet with coal industry workers before returning to the capital for high-level talks with Lao General Secretary and President Thongloun Sisoulith.

The President issued a formal directive to government agencies, ordering officials to ensure all necessary conditions are met for citizens to celebrate the upcoming holiday.

Meanwhile, the Chairman of the National Assembly paid tribute to former Party and State leaders, visiting their private residences to offer incense in their honor.

In a separate holiday gesture, Nhan Dan, the official newspaper of the Communist Party, announced it has donated 40,000 copies of its special Spring edition to soldiers stationed at border posts and on remote islands.

The saturation of Vietnamese state media coverage surrounding the leadership’s activities this week follows a well-worn PR playbook ahead of the Lunar New Year (Tet). These carefully choreographed appearances are designed to project an image of a ruling elite that is deeply connected to the working class, military personnel, and traditional cultural values. However, beneath the optics of these high-profile visits lies a distinct lack of substantive policy development or economic reform.

Observers note that the current flurry of activity is almost entirely ceremonial. Directives such as "ensuring a prosperous Tet for the people" have become perfunctory annual rhetoric, offering no concrete shifts in social or economic governance. This trend extended to the diplomatic sphere, where high-level meetings with Lao officials served merely to reaffirm the "special relationship" between the two neighboring communist parties—a diplomatic boilerplate that provided little new strategic value.

Ultimately, the heavy media focus on these ritualistic engagements serves a domestic political function. Rather than signaling meaningful changes in national administration, the coverage is intended to bolster the party’s legitimacy and consolidate institutional power during a sensitive period on the political calendar. In the absence of breakthrough policy announcements, these activities underscore a commitment to the status quo rather than a pivot toward substantive reform.